Research on the Philosophy of Religion
John Hick’s Philosophical Advocacy for Pluralism (2012)
Research on Thomas Aquinas
Justification in Aquinas (2010) Love and Charity in Aquinas: The Perfection of Intelligent Will (2011)
Research on the Doctrine of Justification
The Superiority of Faith: John Chrysostom’s Eastern Theology of Justification (2013)
Justification in Aquinas (2010)
•
Book Reviews
•
Jesus and the Eyewitnesses | Richard Bauckham
Review of Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2006. 538 pgs.
The Orthodox Church | Timothy Ware
Review of Ware, Timothy (Bishop Kallistos of Diokleia). The Orthodox Church, 3rd Edition. New York, New York: Penguin Books, 1993. 359 pp.
It’s Religion Stupid | Emerging Historiographies Review of Bethany Moreton. To Serve God and Wal-Mart: The Making of Christian Free Enterprise and Darren Dochuk’s From Bible Belt to Sunbelt: Plain-Folk Religion, Grassroots Politics, and the Rise of Evangelical Conservatism. (2011)
The God of Jesus Christ | Joseph Ratzinger / Pope Benedict
Review of Ratzinger, Joseph. The God of Jesus Christ: Meditations on the Triune God. Translated by Brian McNeil. San Francisco, California: Ignatius Press, 2008.
By Knowledge by Love | Michael Sherwin
Review of Sherwin, Michael S. O.P. By Knowledge and By Love: Charity and Knowledge in the Moral Theology of St. Thomas Aquinas. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005. 270 pp.
The New Concise History of the Crusades | Thomas F. Madden Review of Madden, Thomas F. The New Conscise History of the Crusades. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2005. 280 pgs.
Citing Strategies for Footnotes | Turabain-Chicago Style
Standards for citing website are always changing. Thus I usually take a certain freedom in my own citations to make them look more neat, and to fulfill their purpose (namely, making it easy to pinpoint the exact location another author has cited). Technically, you would cite, for example, my “Aquinas on Justification” in a way that wouldn’t even indicate the page number on the PDF file (making it difficult for the reader who tries to trace the source). If one follows the Chicago Style exactly on this, it would look like this: Bradley R. Cochran, “Justification in Aquinas,” entry posted January 5, 2012, Theophilogue: Theology, Philosophy, Dialogue, https://theophilogue.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/justification-in-aquinas_1xxx_.pdf (accessed July 18, 2012). But I would rather suggest more efficient ways that still mimic the Chicago style, but make the source easier to trace. Here are some examples where you might be pointing the reader to page 3: Bradley R. Cochran, “Justification in Aquinas,” entry posted January 5, 2012, Theophilogue: Theology, Philosophy, Dialogue, https://theophilogue.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/justification-in-aquinas_1xxx_.pdf (accessed July 18, 2012), PDF page 3. Bradley R. Cochran, “Justification in Aquinas,” posted 2012, Theophilogue (https://theophilogue.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/justification-in-aquinas_1xxx_.pdf), accessed 07.18.12, PDF page 3. Bradley R. Cochran, “Justification in Aquinas,” 2012, Theophilogue (theophilogue.com), PDF Catalogue, https://theophilogue.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/justification-in-aquinas_1xxx_.pdf (accessed 07.18.02), PDF page 3. Bradley R. Cochran, “Justification in Aquinas,” posted 2012 on Theophilogue, https://theophilogue.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/justification-in-aquinas_1xxx_.pdf (accessed 07.18.02), 3.
T h e o • p h i l o g u e 
[…] Main menu Skip to primary content Skip to secondary content HomeAbout•audioposts•My StoryPDF CatalogueTop Posts […]