Pay particular attention to the question, and how it’s never answered. Is he saying that modern animals are no longer evolving?
Advertisements
Home » Uncategorized » Richard Dawkins FAIL ::: The God Debates
Richard Dawkins FAIL ::: The God Debates
Advertisements
Latest Posts
-
Remissio Peccatorum in Thomas Aquinas’ Doctrine of Justification: Did Aquinas Hold a Forensic View of Justification?
Aquinas’ use of remissio peccatorum in his Aristotelian taxonomy of justification as the “remission of sins” has led some to conclude that ultimately he argues for…
-
Thomas Aquinas on Justification :: Summa Theologica
I have herein summarized and quoted from articles 1-10 of question 113 in the prima secunda of Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologica: “Of the Effects of Grace.” I…
-
Does Atheist Julian Baggini Consider the Strongest Counter Evidence? :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
I have so far offered mostly praise and appreciation for Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2003), 119 pp. In my last…
-
Is Atheism Really a Positive Worldview? :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
I have so far offered almost nothing but praise and appreciation for Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2003), 119 pp. I…
-
Can A Theist Appreciate Baggini’s Atheism? :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
In the year 2013, all my posts have been a summary of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2003), 119 pp. …
-
Concluding Remarks :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
Is Atheism the same as Humanism? If not, what is the difference? Who are the major atheist thinkers of history and what are some of…
-
Against Religion? :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
What about arguments for the existence of God? Are they sound? Is the faith of religious believers actually based on such rational arguments? In our…
-
Atheism in History :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
In our summary of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism, we have already covered how to better define atheism, explored his summary of the case for atheism,…
-
Atheist Purpose and Meaning :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
We have examined how to better define atheism and the rational case for atheism according to author Julian Baggini. In our last post, I summarized Julian Baggini’s own…
-
Atheist Ethics :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
We have looked at how to better define atheism and the rational case for atheism. In this post I will summarize Julian Baggini’s own summary of atheist ethics,…
-
The Case for Atheism :: Book Review of Julian Baggini’s book Atheism: A Very Short Introduction
In this post I will summarize Julian Baggini’s own summary of the case for atheism, presented in chapter 2 of his book Atheism: A Very Short…
-
What is Atheism? :: A Book Review of Julian Baggini’s “Atheism: A Very Short Introduction”
In the next few posts I will be both summarizing and reviewing a book designed to explain and defend Atheism. The book is not written…
-
John Chrysostom’s Interpretation of Romans 1:1-7 :: The Fathers of the Church
I have summarized highlights of John Chrysostom’s interpretation of the introduction to the book of Romans. I believe they foreshadow much of his interpretation of…
-
A Criticism of Scholastic Theology from an Eastern Orthodox Believer
Remember Francis Shaeffer? The great evangelical apologist who, for example, helped galvanize evangelicals over the issue of abortion? I ran across an old video of…
-
The Unitarian Universalist Church: A Personal Encounter
Who Are the Unitarian Universalists? It was a customary scene I have been familiar with since my own childhood: first-time visitor parking, greeters at the…
-
John Hick (1922-2012): John Hick’s Philosophical Advocacy for Religious Pluralism
**UPDATE: My research article has fluctuated from 3% to 6% in the top viewed trophies at Academia.edu. Famous British theologian and philosopher John Hick passed…
-
A u d i o p o s t :: A Wake Up Call :: The Continuation of Human Slavery
For those of us who tend to think of slavery as merely a historical evil (that is, an evil only to be studied from our…
-
A u d i o p o s t :: The Great Questions
The following audio is a book reading about “The Great Questions” from William Portier’s Tradition and Incarnation: Foundations of Christian Theology (Mahwah, New Jersey: Paulist…
-
Do Catholics Practice Open Communion? :: The Case of Frère Roger
Do Catholics practice open communion? In the past, I would’ve answered this with a simple: No. And perhaps on the local level for many Protestants…
-
Book Review: Symbol & Sacrament: A Contemporary Sacramental Theology by Michael G. Lawler
Lawler, G. Michael. Symbol and Sacrament: A Contemporary Sacramental Theology. Omaha, Nebraska: Creighton University Press, 1995. 293 pp. Two foundational principles guide our author in…
Indeed, he doesn’t answer the question, in 2 minutes. Where is the rest of the film? I’m betting he answered it after this little slice. I could be wrong though.
I supposed the could’ve edited the film the way Bill Maher did his documentary, leaving out substantive responses. But what is capture here appears to be his complete answer.
While I’m not clairvoyant, I’m going to assume you saw this video, it reaffirmed some silly notion you had, and didn’t research it in the slightest way possible. Because if you for even 2 minutes, this would have come up.
http://www.skeptics.com.au/articles/dawkins.htm
This is an article written by Dawkins about the event, where he describes what happened and then goes on to adequately explain the answer to the question.
I don’t intend to sound like an ass, but I am a little terse with people who do this sort of thing. Any research at all would have found this article. I was fully ready to give you this one until I found this article. Intellectual honesty is more important than being right..
http://www.skeptics.com.au/articles/dawkins.htm
A person who thinks before he speaks!!!? How unusual! A rare clip indeed, I thought this species was almost extinct.
Sorry Sisyphus, my spam filter blocked your comment and I just now discovered it.
I don’t always do extensive research before posting things that are interesting to me–that’s the difference between my blog and my research papers. That’s part of why my comments section is open, so people like you can offer helpful resources. Next time, however, you should do so more gracefully. It would make your point more winsome.
I read his point of view in the link you offer. It’s very interesting in several ways to me. I’m not a scientist, so everything I say must be taken with that in mind … but the most interesting of all is that his admission that mutation is a narrowing down of information from possibilities seems to play right into the hands of what appears to be the “creationist” contention that such a phenomenon is not actually increasing information.
He concludes, “Mutation is not an increase in true information content, rather the reverse, for mutation, in the Shannon analogy, contributes to increasing the prior uncertainty.”
Very interesting to me, but I’m not a scientist, so all I can do is say, “Hmmmm …”